Projectile Motion

I. Introduction This study focuses on the different particularors that affect the game results of the throwing events namely, javelin throw, discus throw, and shot put throw. It is observed that during athletic meets, the winner is impelled by the farthest throwing out maintain. However, this remoteness does not sum up the outstanding performance of a kind athlete. Several factors are deemed to be essential in strategically winning a throwing event. For instance, an athlete w stoolethorn need more effort in performing as compared to another because of certain physical or strategic hindrances.These hindrances seem to be inexistent when a game is analyzed using the outgo covered only. gum olibanum for the purposes of this study, the competition outcome is defined to be the resulting rocket salad from the throw. In analyzing the projectile, the research is opened to the influences of strategies beyond throwing the farthest. These factors shadower be grouped into three aspects the thrown objects standard measures, the strategy, and the players characteristics. First, the projectile allows us to hit the books the effects of the thrown objects standard measures to the throwing ability of a player.These measurements complicate the weight of the object, and its circumference, in the object lesson of the shot put and the discus, or its length, in the case of the javelin. Second, the projectile exposes the mishap of implementing various strategies that may affect the throwing duration, such as the angle of the throw and the velocity of the turn, in the case of the shot put and discus throw, or run, in the case of the javelin throw. Finally, the projectile also somehow illustrates the advantages or disadvantages of the players characteristics like elevation, weight, and body-build.Consequently, the research testament not be tied to the distance results of the throwing events. Rather, it depart be concerning thee different projectile elements distance, h eight, angle, and force as they are influenced by the aforementioned groups of variables. At the set aside of the day, this reputation will justify the inevitability of standards with regard to the objects careful properties, and will root on the best player profile and playing strategy, as weathered by the projectile results of conducted investigates.Projectile headProjectile Motion research laboratory Report Objectives This laboratory essay presents the opportunity to study deed in two dimensions, projectile intercommunicate, which dismiss be described as accelerated motion in the erect direction and same motion in the swimming direction. Procedures and apparatus Rubber Ball White sheets of papers Metal Track riled Books Table Meter-stick Stopwatch observe all the apparatus and material indispensable to proceed with experiment quite a little up a ramp using the metal track and a bunch of books at whatsoever angle so that the orb will roll away. Meas ure the distance from the edge of the fudge to the stop over of the ramp. Roll the thump mess the ramp and bump off the table tho make sure to watch over the stumblebum as presently as it leaves the table do this per centum 10 clock and nature the clock times Calculate median(a) velocity for this step Measure the height ( perp blockadeicular distance or the y-axis) of the table. exploitation this height, derive t (time) from the homogeneous accelerated motion in dress to gain the predicted distance x. The future(a) step is to release the dinner gown from the ramp and let it fall off the table to the appall. Measure the injury on the floor where the bollock hits the floor point when the egg rolls off the table. We positioned a piece of paper on the floor on which the ball fall guys the spots it hit first to achieve this we wet the ball with water so the mark will be more evident Record these distances at least 3 times in and add them up to obtain the a ctual distance x. equate these actual results with the predicted distance, which you obtain in the first part using invariant motion.Summary of Theory Projectile motion in two dimensions canful be predicted by treating the motion as two independent motions the flat (x) component of the motion and the tumid (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by observing a ball rolling down thusly leaving the ramp, thus becoming a projectile with a crosswise initial velocity. We measured the flat and vertical distances that the projectile traveled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a rhythm stick to measure. -The correct comparison for the horizontal motion use was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The par used to find the time was the derived uniform accelerated motion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the speedup collectible to gravity g on the vertic al motion % Error, actual-predicted x cytosine% actual Data and Results running game Times(s) focal ratio(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 000084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 upper limit velocity 11. 36m/s Minimum Velocity 12. 0m/s Average Velocity 12. 01m/s Table superlative degree 76. 30cm Predicted jounce point 47. 32cm Minimum move point distance 44. 76cm upper limit impact point distance 50. 51cm Actual impact point distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observations Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was short by only 1cm of the actual X shelter of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so establish on these results we support our predicted X value given the collected info from the experiment. I also deliberate the % error and it was only 2. 14% and that again confirms our straight result. One of the reasons for this accura te result was the technique we used to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we wet the ball with water so it will leave a mark on the paper place along the meter-stick. Another evidence to support our results was the height of table strand from the kinematics equations was 76. cm while that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirmed that the horizontal speedup is always zero, but the horizontal distance that the ball covers before large the ground does depend on initial velocity because we used uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-direction is always zero at the beginning of the flight. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the independence of vertical and horizontal motion. Through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a moving object.Projectile MotionProjectile Motion Lab Report Objectives This laboratory experiment presents the opportunity to study motion in two dimensions, projectile motion, which can be described as accelerated motion in the vertical direction and uniform motion in the horizontal direction. Procedures and Apparatus Rubber Ball White sheets of papers Metal Track Water Books Table Meter-stick Stopwatch Obtain all the apparatus and material needed to proceed with experiment Set up a ramp using the metal track and a bunch of books at any angle so that the ball will roll off. Measure the distance from the edge of the table to the end of the ramp. Roll the ball down the ramp and off the table but make sure to catch the ball as soon as it leaves the table do this part 10 times and record the times Calculate average velocity for this step Measure the height (vertical distance or the y-axis) of the table. Using this height, derive t (time) from the uniform accelerated motion in order to obtain the predicted distance x. The next step is to release the ball from the ramp and let it fa ll off the table to the floor. Measure the spot on the floor where the ball hits the floor point when the ball rolls off the table. We positioned a piece of paper on the floor on which the ball marks the spots it hit first to achieve this we wet the ball with water so the mark will be more evident Record these distances at least 3 times in and add them up to obtain the actual distance x. Compare these actual results with the predicted distance, which you obtain in the first part using uniform motion.Summary of Theory Projectile motion in two dimensions can be predicted by treating the motion as two independent motions the horizontal (x) component of the motion and the vertical (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by observing a ball rolling down then leaving the ramp, thus becoming a projectile with a horizontal initial velocity. We measured the horizontal and vertical distances that the projectile traveled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a meter stick to measure. -The correct equation for the horizontal motion used was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The equation used to find the time was the derived uniform accelerated motion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the acceleration due to gravity g on the vertical motion % Error, actual-predicted x 100% actual Data and Results Trial Times(s) Velocity(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 000084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 Maximum Velocity 11. 36m/s Minimum Velocity 12. 0m/s Average Velocity 12. 01m/s Table Height 76. 30cm Predicted impact point 47. 32cm Minimum impact point distance 44. 76cm Maximum impact point distance 50. 51cm Actual impact point distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observations Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was short by only 1cm of the actual X value of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so based on these results we support our predicted X value given the collected data from the experiment. I also calculated the % error and it was only 2. 14% and that again confirms our accurate result. One of the reasons for this accurate result was the technique we used to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we wet the ball with water so it will leave a mark on the paper place along the meter-stick. Another evidence to support our results was the height of table found from the kinematics equations was 76. cm while that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirmed that the horizontal acceleration is always zero, but the horizontal distance that the ball covers before striking the ground does depend on initial velocity because we used uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-direction is always zero at the beginning of the trajecto ry. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the independence of vertical and horizontal motion. Through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a moving object.Projectile MotionProjectile Motion Lab Report Objectives This laboratory experiment presents the opportunity to study motion in two dimensions, projectile motion, which can be described as accelerated motion in the vertical direction and uniform motion in the horizontal direction. Procedures and Apparatus Rubber Ball White sheets of papers Metal Track Water Books Table Meter-stick Stopwatch Obtain all the apparatus and material needed to proceed with experiment Set up a ramp using the metal track and a bunch of books at any angle so that the ball will roll off. Measure the distance from the edge of the table to the end of the ramp. Roll the ball down the ramp and off the table but make sure to catch the ball as soon as it leaves the table d o this part 10 times and record the times Calculate average velocity for this step Measure the height (vertical distance or the y-axis) of the table. Using this height, derive t (time) from the uniform accelerated motion in order to obtain the predicted distance x. The next step is to release the ball from the ramp and let it fall off the table to the floor. Measure the spot on the floor where the ball hits the floor point when the ball rolls off the table. We positioned a piece of paper on the floor on which the ball marks the spots it hit first to achieve this we wet the ball with water so the mark will be more evident Record these distances at least 3 times in and add them up to obtain the actual distance x. Compare these actual results with the predicted distance, which you obtain in the first part using uniform motion.Summary of Theory Projectile motion in two dimensions can be predicted by treating the motion as two independent motions the horizontal (x) component of th e motion and the vertical (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by observing a ball rolling down then leaving the ramp, thus becoming a projectile with a horizontal initial velocity. We measured the horizontal and vertical distances that the projectile traveled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a meter stick to measure. -The correct equation for the horizontal motion used was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The equation used to find the time was the derived uniform accelerated motion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the acceleration due to gravity g on the vertical motion % Error, actual-predicted x 100% actual Data and Results Trial Times(s) Velocity(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 000084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 Maximum Velocity 11. 36 m/s Minimum Velocity 12. 0m/s Average Velocity 12. 01m/s Table Height 76. 30cm Predicted impact point 47. 32cm Minimum impact point distance 44. 76cm Maximum impact point distance 50. 51cm Actual impact point distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observations Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was short by only 1cm of the actual X value of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so based on these results we support our predicted X value given the collected data from the experiment. I also calculated the % error and it was only 2. 14% and that again confirms our accurate result. One of the reasons for this accurate result was the technique we used to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we wet the ball with water so it will leave a mark on the paper place along the meter-stick. Another evidence to support our results was the height of table found from the kinematics equations was 76. cm while that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirmed that the horizontal acceleration is always zero, but the horizontal distance that the ball covers before striking the ground does depend on initial velocity because we used uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-direction is always zero at the beginning of the trajectory. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the independence of vertical and horizontal motion. Through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a moving object.